Off-campus Fuller users: Please use the following link to log into our proxy server and download this thesis.

Publication Date



The purpose of this doctoral project is to develop a spiritual formation model that will help the congregants of Bellevue Christian Church (hereafter, BCC) become spiritually formed disciples of Jesus Christ. It was initiated in response to the perceived historical failure of our church to have a clearly articulated and sustainable process for making disciples.

In order to ensure that the model is contextually relevant to the BCC environment, a thorough study was conducted on both the community and church context. In addition, the project consulted various scholarly literary sources, the beliefs of our movement, and the relevant biblical text to help maintain theological and biblical integrity. The outcome of this initial research is a contextually relevant and theologically sound foundation upon which to build the model.

The foundational aspects of the spiritual formation model are followed by a series of congregational goals, along with content elements that would facilitate their achievement. Among other things, the elements are designed to create a framework centered on the three primary means of “gather,” “train,” and “go.” This simple framework is designed to be accessible to congregants, and if needed, it can be coupled with an optional discipleship coaching relationship in order to assist the congregant in developing a personalized discipleship pathway. In addition to the content elements, core values are established to help keep the model in focus, and within the desired discipleship parameters.

This plan is followed by a strategic implementation timeline that is structured around a one year pilot project. Although the timeline projects aggressive milestones and completion dates, it remains flexible enough to accommodate the church calendar and the schedules of all involved in the planning.

Content Reader: Keith Matthews

Date Created

April 2018

Collection Number


Document Type







Material is subject to copyright.


This was uploaded by the David Allan Hubbard Library from the Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN). If there are any mistakes in this record, please contact